Showroom Dummy (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} dismalsportfan) wrote,@ 2008-10-26 20:03:00 |
|
the phrase
"potential adversarial use of Twitter" warms my heart for some reason.
The scenario described below makes me uneasy, but probably not for the same reason it makes the writers uneasy:
"Scenario 2: Terrorist operative 'A' has a mobile phone for Tweet messaging and for taking images. Operative 'A' also has a separate mobile phone that is actually an explosive device and/or a suicide vest for remote detonation. Terrorist operative 'B' has the detonator and a mobile to view 'A's' Tweets and images. This may allow 'B' to select the precise moment of remote detonation based on near real time movement and imagery that is being sent by 'A.'"
Um...wait, what?
"potential adversarial use of Twitter" warms my heart for some reason.
The scenario described below makes me uneasy, but probably not for the same reason it makes the writers uneasy:
"Scenario 2: Terrorist operative 'A' has a mobile phone for Tweet messaging and for taking images. Operative 'A' also has a separate mobile phone that is actually an explosive device and/or a suicide vest for remote detonation. Terrorist operative 'B' has the detonator and a mobile to view 'A's' Tweets and images. This may allow 'B' to select the precise moment of remote detonation based on near real time movement and imagery that is being sent by 'A.'"
Um...wait, what?
